Palavras-chave
Recompensa
Dopamina
Comportamento Dirigido a Objetivos
Neurociência Cognitiva
Como Citar
Resumo
A motivação para comportamentos dirigidos a objetivos depende da orquestração hierárquica entre sistemas cerebrais de valoração e controle executivo. Esta revisão integrativa sintetizou evidências de que a dopamina, atuando no eixo mesocorticolímbico, sinaliza primariamente o erro de predição de recompensa e mobiliza o esforço necessário para a ação, fundamentando o componente de "desejo" (wanting) motivacional. Este sinal é integrado por circuitos corticoestriatais, nos quais a conectividade funcional entre o estriado ventral e o córtex pré-frontal dorsolateral é essencial para transformar a valoração em planos de ação persistentes, capazes de superar custos e distrações. A desregulação deste sistema gera psicopatologias opostas: a hipofunção e a desconexão frontoestriatal estão associadas à apatia e anedonia na depressão, enquanto a hipersensibilização do sistema de recompensa a estímulos específicos sustenta a busca compulsiva no vício. Conclui-se que a motivação adaptativa requer o equilíbrio dinâmico e a comunicação eficaz dentro desta rede, oferecendo um modelo integrado para o desenvolvimento de intervenções direcionadas.
Referências
Salamone JD, Correa M. The mysterious motivational functions of mesolimbic dopamine. Neuron. 2012;76(3):470-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2012.10.021
Berridge KC, Robinson TE. Liking, wanting, and the incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Am Psychol. 2016;71(8):670-9. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000059
Pessoa L. On the relationship between emotion and cognition. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008;9(2):148-58. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2317
Schultz W. Dopamine reward prediction-error signalling: a two-component response. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2016;17(3):183-95. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2015.26
Wise RA. Dopamine, learning and motivation. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004;5(6):483-94. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1406
Berridge KC. From prediction error to incentive salience: mesolimbic computation of reward motivation. Eur J Neurosci. 2012;35(7):1124-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2012.07990.x
Schultz W. Neuronal reward and decision signals: from theories to data. Physiol Rev. 2015;95(3):853-951. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00023.2014
Niv Y. Reinforcement learning in the brain. J Math Psychol. 2009;53(3):139-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2008.12.005
Haber SN, Knutson B. The reward circuit: linking primate anatomy and human imaging. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010;35(1):4-26. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2009.129
Balleine BW, O'Doherty JP. Human and rodent homologies in action control: corticostriatal determinants of goal-directed and habitual action. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010;35(1):48-69. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2009.131
Der-Avakian A, Markou A. The neurobiology of anhedonia and other reward-related deficits. Trends Neurosci. 2012;35(1):68-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2011.11.005
Volkow ND, Wise RA, Baler R. The dopamine motive system: implications for drug and food addiction. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017;18(11):741-52. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2017.130
Botvinick M, Braver T. Motivation and cognitive control: from behavior to neural mechanism. Annu Rev Psychol. 2015;66:83-113. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015044
Souza MT, Silva MD, Carvalho R. Revisão integrativa: o que é e como fazer. Einstein (São Paulo). 2010;8(1):102-6. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1679-45082010rw1134
Whittemore R, Knafl K. The integrative review: updated methodology. J Adv Nurs. 2005;52(5):546-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x
Botelho LLR, Cunha CCA, Macedo M. O método da revisão integrativa nos estudos organizacionais. Gest Soc. 2011;5(11):121-36. https://doi.org/10.21171/ges.v5i11.1220
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Papalini S, Beckers T, Vervliet B. Dopamine: from prediction error to psychotherapy. Transl Psychiatry. 2020;10:164. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-020-0814-x
Borsini A, St John Wallis A, Zunszain P, Pariante CM, Kempton MJ. Characterizing anhedonia: a systematic review of neuroimaging across the subtypes of reward processing deficits in depression. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2020;20(4):816-41. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-020-00804-6
Horne SJ, Topp ET, Quigley L. Depression and the willingness to expend cognitive and physical effort for rewards: a systematic review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2021;88:102065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2021.102065
Bailey MR, Chun E, Schipani E, Balsam PD, Simpson EH. Dissociating the effects of dopamine D2 receptors on effort-based versus value-based decision making using a novel behavioral approach. Behav Neurosci. 2020;134(2):101-18. https://doi.org/10.1037/bne0000361
Salamone JD, Correa M. The neurobiology of activational aspects of motivation: exertion of effort, effort-based decision making, and the role of dopamine. Annu Rev Psychol. 2024;75:1-32. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-020223-012208
Salamone JD, Ecevitoglu A, Carratala-Ros C, Presby RE, Edelstein GA, Fleeher R, et al. Complexities and paradoxes in understanding the role of dopamine in incentive motivation and instrumental action: exertion of effort vs. anhedonia. Brain Res Bull. 2022;182:57-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2022.01.019
Corlett PR, Mollick JA, Kober H. Meta-analysis of human prediction error for incentives, perception, cognition, and action. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2022;47(7):1339-49. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-021-01264-3
Kok A. Cognitive control, motivation and fatigue: a cognitive neuroscience perspective. Brain Cogn. 2022;160:105880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2022.105880
Wang S, et al. Anhedonia as a central factor in depression: neural mechanisms revealed from preclinical to clinical evidence. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2021;110:110289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2021.110289
Liang S, Wu Y, Li H, Greenshaw AJ, Li T. Anhedonia in depression and schizophrenia: brain reward and aversion circuits. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2022;18:1385-96. https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S367839
Ekhtiari H, Zare-Bidoky M, Sangchooli A, et al. A methodological checklist for fMRI drug cue reactivity studies: development and expert consensus. Nat Protoc. 2022;17(3):567-95. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-021-00649-4
Addiction Cue-Reactivity Initiative (ACRI) Network, et al. Parameter space and potential for biomarker development in 25 years of fMRI drug cue reactivity: a systematic review. JAMA Psychiatry. 2024;81(4):414-25. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2023.5483
Pollard AA, Hauson AO, Lackey NS, et al. Functional neuroanatomy of craving in heroin use disorder: voxel-based meta-analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) drug cue reactivity studies. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2023;49(4):418-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/00952990.2023.2172423
Bore MC, Liu X, Gan X, et al. Distinct neurofunctional alterations during motivational and hedonic processing of natural and monetary rewards in depression: a neuroimaging meta-analysis. Psychol Med. 2024;54(4):639-51. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291723003410
Kieslich K, Valton V, Roiser JP. Pleasure, reward value, prediction error and anhedonia. Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2022;58:281-304. https://doi.org/10.1007/7854_2021_295
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Direitos autorais (c) 2026 Global Academic Nursing Journal